DoD Information Enterprise Architecture The Defense Information Enterprise Architecture (DIEA) provides a common foundation to support Department of Defense (DoD) transformation to net-centric operations and establishes priorities to address critical barriers to its realization. in accordance with the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer (DoD CIO) Memorandum (Reference (g)), the NARA Federal Enterprise Architecture Records Management Profile (Reference (h)), and statutory requirements. DoD Enterprise Architecture An Enterprise Architecture (EA) describes the “current architecture” and “target architecture,” and provides a strategy that will enable an agency to transition from its current state to its target environment. Support discovery and understandability of EA data: Discovery of EA data using DM2 categories of information, Understandability of EA data using DM2’s precise semantics augmented with linguistic traceability (aliases). [1] In February 2004 the documentation of Version 1.0 was released with volume "I: Definitions and Guidelines", "II: Product Descriptions" and a "Deskbook". It defines the capability gap in terms of the functional area, the relevant range of military operations, desired effects, and time. One note: while the DoDAF does not list the OV-1 artifact as a core product, its development is strongly encouraged. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description.[6]. The DON CIO develops, maintains and facilitates a DON Enterprise Architecture (DON EA) that complies with Federal and Department of Defense (DoD) architectures. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. Develops DoD strategy and policy on the operation and protection of all DoD IT and information systems, including development and promulgation of enterprise-wide architecture requirements and technical standards, and enforcement, operation, and maintenance of systems, interoperability, collaboration, and interface between DoD and non-DoD systems. The Logical Data Model (LDM) adds technical information, such as attributes to the CDM and, when necessary, clarifies relationships into an unambiguous usage definition. The discussion of the DoD Enterprise Architecture Technical Reference Model (DoD EA TRM) follows. This course examines Department of Defense (DoD) policy, direction, and guidance related to Enterprise Architecture development and implementation. (1) Records management requirements (as described in DoD 5015.02-STD (Reference Like other EA approaches, for example The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), DoDAF is organized around a shared repository to hold work products. No federal endorsement of sponsors intended. The figure "DoDAF V1.5 Products Matrix" shows how the DoD Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 6212.01E specifies which DoDAF V1.5 products are required for each type of analysis, in the context of the Net-Ready Key Performance Parameter (NR-KPP): Representations for the DoDAF products may be drawn from many diagramming techniques including: There is a UPDM (Unified Profile for DoDAF and MODAF) effort within the OMG to standardize the representation of DoDAF products when UML is used. Any information, products, services or hyperlinks contained within this website does not constitute any type of endorsement by the DoD, Air Force, Navy or Army. [18] DoDAF proclaims latitude in work product format, without professing one diagramming technique over another. First, it articulates an enterprise view of the future where more common foundational technology is delivered across the DoD Components. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems. Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes: The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. The purpose of DoDAF is to define concepts and models usable in DoD's six core processes: Joint Capabilities Integration and Development (JCIDS), Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE). Increase utility and effectiveness of architectures via a rigorous data model – the DoDAF Meta Model (DM2) -- so the architectures can be integrated, analyzed, and evaluated with more precision. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. The DoD Enterprise Architecture (EA) Transition Strategy 2008 follows the outline in the Federal Practice Guidance, November 2007, for developing a Transition Strategy and meeting the criteria for the OMB EA Assessment. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. When pre-DoDAF V2.0 architecture is compared with DoDAF V2.0 architecture, concept differences (such as Node) must be defined or explained for the newer architecture. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. Develop, implement, and maintain an enterprise architecture that incorporates and integrates high-level strategic descriptions of DLA missions, organizations, business processes, data, applications, and infrastructure to meet and align with Joint Staff and DOD Business Enterprise Architecture requirements. Documents the need for a materiel solution to a specific capability gap derived from an initial analysis of alternatives executed by the operational user and, as required, an independent analysis of alternatives. The Department of the Navy is a complex organization with disparate architecture development efforts and … The IEA consists of three types of architecture: Operational, Systems, and Enterprise Architecture. What is the DoD Enterprise DevSecOps architecture? Represented in the DoDAF V2.0 DIV-3 Viewpoint. Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) – Chapter 7, DoD Information Enterprise Architecture Version, 7 May 2010, DoD Information Enterprise Architecture V1.0 by Terry Hagle for OSD. Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). The Army Information Enterprise Architecture (IEA) represents the totality of the LandWarNet architecture, as it supports the Army’s warfighting, business, and defense intelligence missions. The architectures for DoDAF V1.0 and DoDAF V1.5 may continue to be used. What is our current set of capabilities that we are managing as part of a portfolio? DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. EA Curriculum Requirements Architect Certificate (4 Courses) Required ARC (6412) - Enterprise Architectures for Leaders MEA (6439) - Modeling for Enterprise Architecture DAC (6438) - Defense Enterprise Architecture Elective - Take One PRI (6333) - Strategies for Process Improvement DMS (6414) - Data Management Strategies and Technologies: A Managerial … In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product (such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided) should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.". The efficacy of DoDAF at the U.S. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated: Creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF, Relationship to other architecture frameworks, Evolution of DoDAF V1.5 Views to DoDAF V2.0 Viewpoints, Mapping of DoDAF V1.5 Views to DoDAF V2.0 Viewpoints, Department of Defense Architecture Framework, Ministry of Defence Architecture Framework, Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework, "CJCSM 3170.01C OPERATION OF THE JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM", "DODAF - DOD Architecture Framework Version 2.02 - DOD Deputy Chief Information Officer", "DoDAF V2.0 Volume 2 Architects Guide May 2009", "Information Support Plan (DAU ACQuipedia entry)", "Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: The Fad of the Century", Architectural Data and Models – Architect’s Guide, Meta-model Ontology Foundation and Physical Exchange Specification – Developer’s Guide, DoDAF section of Architecture Framework Forum, DoD CMO Business Enterprise Architecture (BEA), Department of Defense Information Enterprise Architecture, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Department_of_Defense_Architecture_Framework&oldid=1003090672, United States Department of Defense information technology, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. OV-1 : High Level Operational Concept Graphic, OV-2 : Operational Node Connectivity Description, OV-3 : Operational Informational Exchange Matrix. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. In April 2007 the Version 1.5 was released with a documentation of "Definitions and Guidelines", "Product Descriptions" and "Architecture Data Description". The intent of this RA is to ensure integration with JIE architecture and ensure Army implementations are postured to leverage JIE capabilities. See the diagram for a depiction of the Capabilities Emphasis, as tied in with mission/course of action, threads, activities, and architectures. The DODAF 2.0 Architects Guide [14] repeated DOD Instruction 4630.8 definition of an integrated architecture as "An architecture consisting of multiple views facilitating integration and promoting interoperability across capabilities and among integrated architectures. All DoD activities that create containers which could benefit the DoD at an enterprise scale should publish their containers’ source code in the DCCSCR. The DoDAF V1.5 SV products are: Technical standards view (TV) products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. The conceptual level or Conceptual Data Model (CDM) defines the high-level data constructs from which Architectural Descriptions are created in non-technical terms, so that executives and managers at all levels can understand the data basis of Architectural Description. These descriptions are developed and maintained at the Department, Capability Area, and Component levels and collectively define the people, processes, and technology required in the “current” and “target” environments, and the roadmap for transition to the target environment. Description The Enterprise Architect searches, develops/documents, and analyzes enterprise, operational, and system architectures for Department of Defense (DOD) combatant command headquarters, dev... 8 days ago Senior-Level Network/Product Engineer - Active DoD Secret Clearance HumanTouch, LLCVA - McLeanFull-Time In addition, DoDAF 2.0's specific goals were to: Establish guidance for architecture content as a function of purpose – “fit for purpose”. DoD is developing a similar set of reference models to facilitate net-centric transformation, re-use, as well as EA alignment to the FEA RMs. Represented in the DoDAF V2.0 DIV-1 Viewpoint. The DoDAF V1.5 TV products are as follows: In DoDAF V2.0, architectural viewpoints are composed of data that has been organized to facilitate understanding. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. Other derivative frameworks based on DoDAF include the NATO Architecture Framework (NAF) and Ministry of Defence Architecture Framework. SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical (geographical) locations. AcqNotes is not an official Department of Defense (DoD), Air Force, Navy, or Army website. [4][5], The first version of the development DoDAF was developed in the 1990s under the name C4ISR Architecture Framework. For programs not designated OSD special interest by. The DODAF 2.0 Architects Guide repeated DOD Instruction 4630.8 definition of an integrated architecture as "An architecture consisting of multiple views facilitating integration and promoting interoperability across capabilities and among integrated architectures. The DoDAF V1.5 OV products are defined as: Systems and services view (SV) is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. [1]. A document that captures the information necessary to develop a proposed program(s), normally using an evolutionary acquisition strategy. Enterprise Architecture and Services Board (EASB) Approves all IMA architectures and promulgates them to DoD Components via memo. How does a particular capability or capabilities support the overall mission/vision? Conformance ensures that reuse of information, architecture artifacts, models, and viewpoints can be shared with common understanding. The current release is DoDAF 2.02. Architecture and ensures alignment with DOD Information Enterprise Architecture (DIEA), industry best practices, and the Joint Information Environment (JIE). Access to and use of this websites information is at the user's risk. deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.[1].
Gd Rappers 2020, Can You Save Game On Monopoly Switch, Unibuddy Admin Login, Rimworld Combat Extended Centipede, Dear Uncle Tacitus Letter, John Quiñones Age, Genie B8qacsct Battery, 40 Lakh House Design, Best Honey Cake Recipe, Kum Masterpiece Sharpener Canada,